S. Park
To Win
S. Saito
To Win
Sara Saito vs Varvara Lepchenko Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W L W L W L W L
Form
L W W L W W W L W LHead-To-Head: Saito 0 - 0 Lepchenko
| Saito | Stats | Lepchenko |
|---|---|---|
| 64% (14-8) | YTD Win/Loss | 52% (12-11) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 165 | Ranking | 120 |
| 150 | Highest Rank | 19 |
| 18 | Age | 38 |
| - | Plays | L |
| 3 | Titles | 14 |
| 64% (91-51) | Career Total W/L | 56% (628-487) |
| $12,193 | Career Prize Money | $3,235,725 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
Upcoming Match
23 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Uchijima VS Montgomery PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Tien VS Giron PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
23 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
No H2H Matches Available
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Sara Saito Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Dalma Galfi
Player
Sara Saito
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve %
71%
(
39 of
55)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
76%
(
13 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
26%
(
11 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sara Saito
Player
Jesika Maleckova
51%
(
53 of
103)
1st Serve %
45%
(
39 of
86)
3
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
5
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
31 of
39)
46%
(
23 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
42%
(
43 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
86)
93
Total Points Won
96
|
1-6 7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Aneta Kladivova
Player
Sara Saito
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
49%
(
22 of
45)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
24 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sara Saito
Player
Chelsea Fontenel
58%
(
42 of
72)
1st Serve %
67%
(
59 of
88)
2
Aces
3
10
Double Faults
2
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
33%
(
10 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
44%
(
32 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
48 of
88)
88
Total Points Won
72
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Caroline Werner
Player
Sara Saito
66%
(
61 of
93)
1st Serve %
65%
(
45 of
69)
1
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
4
56%
(
34 of
61)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
38%
(
12 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
51%
(
47 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
36 of
69)
82
Total Points Won
80
|
2-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sara Saito
Player
Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva
68%
(
83 of
122)
1st Serve %
67%
(
67 of
100)
2
Aces
0
11
Double Faults
7
52%
(
43 of
83)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
34 of
67)
41%
(
16 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
69%
(
9 of
13)
Break Points Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
52%
(
63 of
122)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
54 of
100)
113
Total Points Won
109
|
6-4 4-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Haruka Kaji
Player
Sara Saito
66%
(
62 of
94)
1st Serve %
64%
(
56 of
88)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
9
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
35 of
56)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
39%
(
37 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
40 of
88)
97
Total Points Won
85
|
5-7 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sara Saito
Player
Sohyun Park
57%
(
38 of
67)
1st Serve %
77%
(
61 of
79)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
33 of
61)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
39%
(
26 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
79)
79
Total Points Won
67
|
3-6 6-1 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sara Saito
Player
Momoko Kobori
53%
(
34 of
64)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
42%
(
27 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
71
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sara Saito
Player
Kayo Nishimura
53%
(
30 of
57)
1st Serve %
73%
(
44 of
60)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
42%
(
24 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
62
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Varvara Lepchenko Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Zeynep Sonmez
Player
Varvara Lepchenko
50%
(
26 of
52)
1st Serve %
55%
(
26 of
47)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
40%
(
21 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Varvara Lepchenko
Player
Harriet Dart
67%
(
59 of
88)
1st Serve %
60%
(
65 of
109)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
58%
(
34 of
59)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
43 of
65)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
13 of
44)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
43%
(
38 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
53 of
109)
103
Total Points Won
94
|
6-4 6-7(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Dalma Galfi
Player
Varvara Lepchenko
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve %
70%
(
38 of
54)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
44%
(
24 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Varvara Lepchenko
Player
Elena Pridankina
62%
(
58 of
94)
1st Serve %
77%
(
61 of
79)
4
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
1
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
36 of
61)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
39%
(
37 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
79)
93
Total Points Won
80
|
6-3 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Varvara Lepchenko
Player
Sinja Kraus
54%
(
28 of
52)
1st Serve %
64%
(
37 of
58)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
61%
(
17 of
28)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
62
Total Points Won
48
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Varvara Lepchenko
Player
Alevtina Ibragimova
52%
(
33 of
63)
1st Serve %
54%
(
34 of
63)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
38%
(
24 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
63)
69
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kaitlin Quevedo
Player
Varvara Lepchenko
62%
(
54 of
87)
1st Serve %
68%
(
64 of
94)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
38 of
64)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
44%
(
38 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
45 of
94)
94
Total Points Won
87
|
6-3 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Varvara Lepchenko
Player
Marina Bassols Ribera
70%
(
57 of
82)
1st Serve %
65%
(
52 of
80)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
48%
(
39 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
80)
82
Total Points Won
80
|
6-4 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Varvara Lepchenko
Player
Dalila Spiteri
75%
(
60 of
80)
1st Serve %
83%
(
49 of
59)
7
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
53%
(
32 of
60)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
45%
(
36 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
74
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hanna Chang
Player
Varvara Lepchenko
41%
(
31 of
75)
1st Serve %
66%
(
63 of
95)
2
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
2
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
35 of
63)
61%
(
27 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
37%
(
28 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
44 of
95)
91
Total Points Won
79
|
4-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 64% (91/51) | Win/Loss | 56% (628/487) |
| 60% (194/129) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (1438/1139) |
| 54% (1596/1348) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (12429/11367) |
| 58% (46/33) | Hard Win/Loss | 58% (378/273) |
| 65% (17/9) | Clay Win/Loss | 58% (183/130) |
| 76% (25/8) | Indoor Hard W/L | 48% (43/47) |
| 75% (3/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 39% (24/37) |
| 0.11 | Aces Per Game | 0.14 |
| 159 | Aces Total | 1635 |
| 0.28 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.18 |
| 404 | Total Double Faults | 2142 |
| 1:32:30 | Average Match Time | 1:4:9 |
| 356.66 | Average Opponent Rank | 458 |
| 67% (6109/9129) | 1st Serve % | 67% (37957/56776) |
| 61% (3744/6109) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (23298/37957) |
| 47% (1417/3020) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (8846/18819) |
| 49% (597/1219) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (3138/6763) |
| 47% (4339/9219) | Return Points Win % | 44% (25173/56944) |
| 40% (2/3) | Slam W/L | 54% (74/63) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 53% (101/88) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 100% (2/0) |
| 40% (4/6) | Main Tour W/L | 47% (153/172) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 68% (84/40) | Challenger W/L | 64% (295/163) |
| 33% (1/2) | Futures W/L | 75% (3/1) |
| 63% (87/138) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (621/1099) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 48% (13/27) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (155/287) |
| 61% (25/41) | Deciding Set Win % | 48% (173/359) |
| 90% (83/75) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (655/548) |
| 10% (83/8) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (655/105) |
| 25% (57/14) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (460/80) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
